Difference between revisions of "THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE"
From Sydapedia
Jump to navigationJump to search (New page: THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE is an unofficial but depressingly accurate rule pertaining to the forums on SydLexia.com. It refers to the fact that at any given time there is only one regul...) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE]] is an unofficial but depressingly accurate rule pertaining to the [[forums]] on SydLexia.com. It refers to the fact that at any given time there is only one regular female poster on the boards. The succession of regular female posters has been as such: | [[THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE]] is an unofficial but depressingly accurate rule pertaining to the [[forums]] on SydLexia.com. It refers to the fact that at any given time there is only one regular female poster on the boards. The succession of regular female posters has been as such: | ||
| − | + | #SamanthaMcPoopenstein | |
| − | + | #Loba | |
| − | + | #aika | |
| − | + | #SoldierHawk | |
| + | #cirno | ||
| + | |||
| + | Actually, cirno, Satrical, and SoldierHawk are all currently regulars on the forums. I guess the rule is void? | ||
Latest revision as of 04:24, 28 June 2009
THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE is an unofficial but depressingly accurate rule pertaining to the forums on SydLexia.com. It refers to the fact that at any given time there is only one regular female poster on the boards. The succession of regular female posters has been as such:
- SamanthaMcPoopenstein
- Loba
- aika
- SoldierHawk
- cirno
Actually, cirno, Satrical, and SoldierHawk are all currently regulars on the forums. I guess the rule is void?
